Content
Copy typora -version 0.9.58 to Clipboard NOTE: This applies to both open source and commercial editions of Chocolatey. Ensure you are set for organizational deployment. Please see the organizational deployment guide. Get the package into your environment. Option 1: Cached Package (Unreliable, Requires Internet - Same As Community). Typora will give you a seamless experience as both a reader and a writer. It removes the preview window, mode switcher, syntax symbols of markdown source code, and all other unnecessary distractions. Replace them with a real live preview feature to help you concentrate the content itself. Note: The issue below was fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M16 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M16 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M17 to obtain a version that includes the fix for this issue, version 9.0.0.M16 is not included in the list of affected versions. 1 wps表格官方版 10.1.0 完整版; 2 histcite 12.03 官方版; 3 办公软件下载office2003免费 完整版; 4 为知笔记 4.11.16; 5 excel2007兼容包 官方版; 6 wps2012官方版 10.1.0 完整版; 7 typora 0.9.49 中文版; 8 excel表格制作2010 官方破解版; 9 新榜微信编辑器 1.0 官方版; 10 office2010中文精简版 免激活破解版. An interesting thing is that when exported as HTML with CSS, Firefox 57.0b7 and Edge 40.15063.674.0 will render the numbering correctly, while Typora 0.9.37 beta and Chrome 61.0.3163.100 will fail. Looks like a CSS engine problem. EDIT: Additionally tested with a blank theme file + base.user.css for autonumbering, and it still doesn't work in.
Table of Contents
Apache Tomcat 9.x vulnerabilities
This page lists all security vulnerabilities fixed in released versions of Apache Tomcat 9.x. Each vulnerability is given a security impact rating by the Apache Tomcat security team — please note that this rating may vary from platform to platform. We also list the versions of Apache Tomcat the flaw is known to affect, and where a flaw has not been verified list the version with a question mark.
Note: Vulnerabilities that are not Tomcat vulnerabilities but have either been incorrectly reported against Tomcat or where Tomcat provides a workaround are listed at the end of this page.
Please note that binary patches are never provided. If you need to apply a source code patch, use the building instructions for the Apache Tomcat version that you are using. For Tomcat 9.0 those are
building.html
and BUILDING.txt
. Both files can be found in the webapps/docs
subdirectory of a binary distribution. You may also want to review the Security Considerations page in the documentation.If you need help on building or configuring Tomcat or other help on following the instructions to mitigate the known vulnerabilities listed here, please send your questions to the public Tomcat Users mailing list
If you have encountered an unlisted security vulnerability or other unexpected behaviour that has security impact, or if the descriptions here are incomplete, please report them privately to the Tomcat Security Team. Thank you.
15 September 2020 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.38
Moderate: HTTP/2 request mix-upCVE-2020-13943
If an HTTP/2 client exceeded the agreed maximum number of concurrent streams for a connection (in violation of the HTTP/2 protocol), it was possible that a subsequent request made on that connection could contain HTTP headers - including HTTP/2 pseudo headers - from a previous request rather than the intended headers. This could lead to users seeing responses for unexpected resources.
This was fixed with commit 55911430.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security team on 23 July 2020. The issue was made public on 12 October 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.37
5 July 2020 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.37
Important: WebSocket DoSCVE-2020-13935
The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
This was fixed with commit 40fa74c7.
This issue was reported publicly via the Apache Bugzilla instance on 28 June 2020 and included references to high CPU but no specific reference to denial of service. The associated DoS risks were identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team the same day. The issue was made public on 14 July 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36
Moderate: HTTP/2 DoSCVE-2020-13934
An h2c direct connection did not release the HTTP/1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP/2. If a sufficient number of such requests were made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur leading to a denial of service.
This was fixed with commit 172977f0.
This issue was reported publicly via the Apache Tomcat Users mailing list on 22 June 2020 without reference to the potential for DoS. After further discussion to identify the steps necessary to reproduce the issue, the root cause of the issue and the associated DoS risks were identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 26 June 2020. The issue was made public on 14 July 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M5 to 9.0.36
7 June 2020 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.36
Important: HTTP/2 DoSCVE-2020-11996
A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive.
This was fixed with commit 9a023168.
This issue was reported publicly via the Apache Tomcat Users mailing list on 21 May 2020 without reference to the potential for DoS. The DoS risks were identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team the same day. The issue was made public on 25 June 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.35
11 May 2020 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.35
Important: Remote Code Execution via session persistenceCVE-2020-9484
If:
- an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and
- the server is configured to use the
PersistenceManager
with aFileStore
; and - the
PersistenceManager
is configured withsessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter='null'
(the default unless aSecurityManager
is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and - the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by
FileStore
to the file the attacker has control over;
then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control.
Note: All of conditions above must be true for the attack to succeed.
As an alternative to upgrading to 9.0.35 or later, users may configure the
PersistenceManager
with an appropriate value for sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter
to ensure that only application provided attributes are serialized and deserialized.This was fixed with commit 3aa8f28d.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by by jarvis threedr3am of pdd security research on 12 April 2020. The issue was made public on 20 May 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34
11 February 2020 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.31
Important: AJP Request Injection and potential Remote Code ExecutionCVE-2020-1938
When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. Prior to Tomcat 9.0.31, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required.
Prior to this vulnerability report, the known risks of an attacker being able to access the AJP port directly were:
- bypassing security checks based on client IP address
- bypassing user authentication if Tomcat was configured to trust authentication data provided by the reverse proxy
This vulnerability report identified a mechanism that allowed the following:
- returning arbitrary files from anywhere in the web application including under the WEB-INF and META-INF directories or any other location reachable via ServletContext.getResourceAsStream()
- processing any file in the web application as a JSP
Further, if the web application allowed file upload and stored those files within the web application (or the attacker was able to control the content of the web application by some other means) then this, along with the ability to process a file as a JSP, made remote code execution possible.
It is important to note that mitigation is only required if an AJP port is accessible to untrusted users. Users wishing to take a defence-in-depth approach and block the vector that permits returning arbitrary files and execution as JSP may upgrade to Apache Tomcat 9.0.31 or later. Users should note that a number of changes were made to the default AJP Connector configuration in 9.0.31 to harden the default configuration. It is likely that users upgrading to 9.0.31 or later will need to make small changes to their configurations as a result.
This was fixed with commits 0e8a50f0, 9ac90532, 64fa5b99, 7a1406a3 and 49ad3f95.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 3 January 2020. The issue was made public on 24 February 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30
Low: HTTP Request SmugglingCVE-2020-1935
The HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line (EOL) parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
This was fixed with commit 8bfb0ff7.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by @ZeddYu on 25 December 2019. The issue was made public on 24 February 2020.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30
Low: HTTP Request SmugglingCVE-2019-17569
The refactoring in 9.0.28 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
This was fixed with commit 060ecc5e.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by @ZeddYu on 12 December 2019. The issue was made public on 24 February 2020.
Affects: 9.0.28 to 9.0.30
12 December 2019 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.30
Low: Session fixationCVE-2019-17563
When using FORM authentication there was a narrow window where an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The window was considered too narrow for an exploit to be practical but, erring on the side of caution, this issue has been treated as a security vulnerability.
This was fixed with commit 1ecba14e.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by William Marlow (IBM) on 19 November 2019. The issue was made public on 18 December 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.29
21 November 2019 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.29
Moderate: Local Privilege EscalationCVE-2019-12418
When Tomcat is configured with the JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener, a local attacker without access to the Tomcat process or configuration files is able to manipulate the RMI registry to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to capture user names and passwords used to access the JMX interface. The attacker can then use these credentials to access the JMX interface and gain complete control over the Tomcat instance.
The JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener will be deprecated in future Tomcat releases, will be removed for Tomcat 10 and may be removed from all Tomcat releases some time after 31 December 2020.
Users should also be aware of CVE-2019-2684, a JRE vulnerability that enables this issue to be exploited remotely.
This was fixed with commit 1fc9f589.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by An Trinh of Viettel Cyber Security on 10 October 2019. The issue was made public on 18 December 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.28
13 May 2019 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.20
Important: Denial of ServiceCVE-2019-10072
The fix for CVE-2019-0199 was incomplete and did not address HTTP/2 connection window exhaustion on write. By not sending WINDOW_UPDATE messages for the connection window (stream 0) clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS.
This was fixed with commits 7f748eb6 and ada725a5.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by John Simpson of Trend Micro Security Research working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative on 26 April 2019. The issue was made public on 20 June 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.19
13 April 2019 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.19
Note: The issues below were fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.18 but the release vote for the 9.0.18 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.19 to obtain a version that includes a fix for these issues, version 9.0.18 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Important: Remote Code Execution on WindowsCVE-2019-0232
When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to a bug in the way the JRE passes command line arguments to Windows. The CGI Servlet is disabled by default. The CGI option enableCmdLineArguments is disabled by default in Tomcat 9.0.x. For a detailed explanation of the JRE behaviour, see Markus Wulftange's blog and this archived MSDN blog.
This was fixed with commit 4b244d82.
This issue was identified by Nightwatch Cybersecurity Research and reported to the Apache Tomcat security team via the bug bounty program sponsored by the EU FOSSA-2 project on 3rd March 2019. The issue was made public on 10 April 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17
Low: XSS in SSI printenvCVE-2019-0221
The SSI printenv command echoes user provided data without escaping and is, therefore, vulnerable to XSS. SSI is disabled by default. The printenv command is intended for debugging and is unlikely to be present in a production website.
This was fixed with commit 15fcd166.
This issue was identified by Nightwatch Cybersecurity Research and reported to the Apache Tomcat security team via the bug bounty program sponsored by the EU FOSSA-2 project on 7th March 2019. The issue was made public on 17 May 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17
8 February 2019 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.16
Note: The issue below was fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.15 but the release vote for the 9.0.15 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.16 to obtain a version that includes a fix for these issues, version 9.0.15 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Typora 0 9 9 31 39 Bolum
Important: Denial of ServiceCVE-2019-0199
The HTTP/2 implementation accepted streams with excessive numbers of
SETTINGS
frames and also permitted clients to keep streams open without reading/writing request/response data. By keeping streams open for requests that utilised the Servlet API's blocking I/O, clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS.This was fixed in revisions 1852698, 1852699, 1852700, 1852701, 1852702, 1852703, 1852704, 1852705, 1852706 and a1cb1ac7.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Michal Karm Babacek from Red Hat, Inc on 4 January 2019 with additional issues identified by the Tomcat Security Team. The issue was made public on 25 March 2019.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.14
10 September 2018 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.12
Typora 0 9 9 31 39 Inches
Moderate: Open RedirectCVE-2018-11784
When the default servlet returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to
/foo/
when the user requested /foo
) a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice.This was fixed in revision 1840055.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Sergey Bobrov on 28 August 2018 and made public on 3 October 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.11
25 June 2018 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.10
Low: host name verification missing in WebSocket clientCVE-2018-8034
The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was missing. It is now enabled by default.
This was fixed in revision 1833757.
This issue was reported publicly on 11 June 2018 and formally announced as a vulnerability on 22 July 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9
Important: Information DisclosureCVE-2018-8037
If an async request was completed by the application at the same time as the container triggered the async timeout, a race condition existed that could result in a user seeing a response intended for a different user. An additional issue was present in the NIO and NIO2 connectors that did not correctly track the closure of the connection when an async request was completed by the application and timed out by the container at the same time. This could also result in a user seeing a response intended for another user.
This was fixed in revisions 1833825, 1833831, 1837530 and 1833906.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Dmitry Treskunov on 16 June 2018 and made public on 22 July 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M9 to 9.0.9
not released Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.9
Low: CORS filter has insecure defaultsCVE-2018-8014
The defaults settings for the CORS filter are insecure and enable
supportsCredentials
for all origins. It is expected that users of the CORS filter will have configured it appropriately for their environment rather than using it in the default configuration. Therefore, it is expected that most users will not be impacted by this issue.This was fixed in revision 1831726.
This issue was reported publicly on 1 May 2018 and formally announced as a vulnerability on 16 May 2018.
3 May 2018 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.8
Important: A bug in the UTF-8 decoder can lead to DoSCVE-2018-1336
An improper handing of overflow in the UTF-8 decoder with supplementary characters can lead to an infinite loop in the decoder causing a Denial of Service.
This was fixed in revision 1830373.
This issue was reported publicly on 6 April 2018 and formally announced as a vulnerability on 22 July 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.7
11 February 2018 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.5
Important: Security constraint annotations applied too lateCVE-2018-1305
Security constraints defined by annotations of Servlets were only applied once a Servlet had been loaded. Because security constraints defined in this way apply to the URL pattern and any URLs below that point, it was possible - depending on the order Servlets were loaded - for some security constraints not to be applied. This could have exposed resources to users who were not authorised to access them.
This was fixed in revisions 1823310 and 1824323.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security on 1 February 2018 and made public on 23 February 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4
Important: Security constraints mapped to context root are ignoredCVE-2018-1304
The URL pattern of ' (the empty string) which exactly maps to the context root was not correctly handled when used as part of a security constraint definition. This caused the constraint to be ignored. It was, therefore, possible for unauthorised users to gain access to web application resources that should have been protected. Only security constraints with a URL pattern of the empty string were affected.
Typora 0 9 9 31 3900
This was fixed in revision 1823306.
This issue was reported publicly as 62067 on 31 January 2018 and the security implications identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team the same day. It was made public on 23 February 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4
30 November 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.2
Low: Incorrectly documented CGI search algorithmCVE-2017-15706
As part of the fix for bug 61201, the description of the search algorithm used by the CGI Servlet to identify which script to execute was updated. The update was not correct. As a result, some scripts may have failed to execute as expected and other scripts may have been executed unexpectedly. Note that the behaviour of the CGI servlet has remained unchanged in this regard. It is only the documentation of the behaviour that was wrong and has been corrected.
This was fixed in revision 1814825.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Jan Michael Greiner on 17 September 2017 and made public on 31 January 2018.
Affects: 9.0.0.M22 to 9.0.1
30 September 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.1
Important: Remote Code ExecutionCVE-2017-12617
When running with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the
readonly
initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.This was fixed in revisions 1809669, 1809674, 1809684 and 1809711.
This issue was first reported publicly followed by multiple reports to the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 20 September 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0
26 June 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M22
Important: Security Constraint BypassCVE-2017-7675
The HTTP/2 implementation bypassed a number of security checks that prevented directory traversal attacks. It was therefore possible to bypass security constraints using an specially crafted URL.
This was fixed in revision 1796090.
The issue was originally reported as a failure to process URL path parameters in bug 61120 on 24 May 2017. The full implications of this issue were identified by the Tomcat Security Team the same day. This issue was made public on 10 August 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M21
Moderate: Cache PoisoningCVE-2017-7674
The CORS Filter did not add an HTTP Vary header indicating that the response varies depending on Origin. This permitted client and server side cache poisoning in some circumstances.
This was fixed in revision 1795813.
The issue was reported as bug 61101 on 16 May 2017. The full implications of this issue were identified by the Tomcat Security Team the same day. This issue was made public on 10 August 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M21
10 May 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M21
Important: Security Constraint BypassCVE-2017-5664
The error page mechanism of the Java Servlet Specification requires that, when an error occurs and an error page is configured for the error that occurred, the original request and response are forwarded to the error page. This means that the request is presented to the error page with the original HTTP method.
If the error page is a static file, expected behaviour is to serve content of the file as if processing a GET request, regardless of the actual HTTP method. Tomcat's Default Servlet did not do this. Depending on the original request this could lead to unexpected and undesirable results for static error pages including, if the DefaultServlet is configured to permit writes, the replacement or removal of the custom error page.
Notes for other user provided error pages:
- Unless explicitly coded otherwise, JSPs ignore the HTTP method. JSPs used as error pages must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method.
- By default, the response generated by a Servlet does depend on the HTTP method. Custom Servlets used as error pages must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method.
This was fixed in revisions 1793468 and 1793487.
This issue was reported responsibly to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Aniket Nandkishor Kulkarni from Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, India as a vulnerability that allowed the restrictions on OPTIONS and TRACE requests to be bypassed on 21 April 2017. The full implications of this issue were identified by the Tomcat Security Team on 24 April 2017. This issue was made public on 6 June 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M20
30 March 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M19
Important: Information DisclosureCVE-2017-5651
The refactoring of the HTTP connectors for 8.5.x onwards, introduced a regression in the send file processing. If the send file processing completed quickly, it was possible for the Processor to be added to the processor cache twice. This could result in the same Processor being used for multiple requests which in turn could lead to unexpected errors and/or response mix-up.
This was fixed in revision 1788544.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 24 March 2017 and made public on 10 April 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18
Important: Denial of ServiceCVE-2017-5650
The handling of an HTTP/2 GOAWAY frame for a connection did not close streams associated with that connection that were currently waiting for a WINDOW_UPDATE before allowing the application to write more data. These waiting streams each consumed a thread. A malicious client could therefore construct a series of HTTP/2 requests that would consume all available processing threads.
This was fixed in revision 1788460.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team by Chun Han Hsiao on 11 March 2017 and made public on 10 April 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18
Important: Information DisclosureCVE-2017-5647
A bug in the handling of the pipelined requests when send file was used resulted in the pipelined request being lost when send file processing of the previous request completed. This could result in responses appearing to be sent for the wrong request. For example, a user agent that sent requests A, B and C could see the correct response for request A, the response for request C for request B and no response for request C.
This was fixed in revision 1788890.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 20 March 2017 and made public on 10 April 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18
13 March 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M18
Low: Information DisclosureCVE-2017-5648
While investigating bug 60718, it was noticed that some calls to application listeners did not use the appropriate facade object. When running an untrusted application under a SecurityManager, it was therefore possible for that untrusted application to retain a reference to the request or response object and thereby access and/or modify information associated with another web application.
This was fixed in revision 1785774.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 20 March 2017 and made public on 10 April 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M17
16 January 2017 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M17
Note: The issue below was fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M16 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M16 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M17 to obtain a version that includes the fix for this issue, version 9.0.0.M16 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Moderate: Information DisclosureCVE-2016-8747
The refactoring to make wider use of ByteBuffer introduced a regression that could cause information to leak between requests on the same connection. When running behind a reverse proxy, this could result in information leakage between users. All HTTP connector variants are affected but HTTP/2 and AJP are not affected.
This was fixed in revision 1774161.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 14 December 2016 and made public on 13 March 2017.
Affects: 9.0.0.M11 to 9.0.0.M15
8 December 2016 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M15
Note: The issue below was fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M14 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M14 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M15 to obtain a version that includes the fix for this issue, version 9.0.0.M14 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Important: Information DisclosureCVE-2016-8745
A bug in the error handling of the send file code for the NIO HTTP connector resulted in the current Processor object being added to the Processor cache multiple times. This in turn meant that the same Processor could be used for concurrent requests. Sharing a Processor can result in information leakage between requests including, but not limited to, session ID and the response body.
This was fixed in revision 1771853.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 8 December 2016 and made public on 12 December 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M13
8 November 2016 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M13
Note: The issues below were fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M12 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M12 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M13 to obtain a version that includes fixes for these issues, version 9.0.0.M12 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Important: Remote Code ExecutionCVE-2016-8735
The
JmxRemoteLifecycleListener
was not updated to take account of Oracle's fix for CVE-2016-3427. Therefore, Tomcat installations using this listener remained vulnerable to a similar remote code execution vulnerability. This issue has been rated as important rather than critical due to the small number of installations using this listener and that it would be highly unusual for the JMX ports to be accessible to an attacker even when the listener is used.This was fixed in revision 1767644.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 19 October 2016 and made public on 22 November 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11
Important: Denial of ServiceCVE-2016-6817
The HTTP/2 header parser entered an infinite loop if a header was received that was larger than the available buffer. This made a denial of service attack possible.
This was fixed in revision 1765794.
This issue was reported as 60232 on 10 October 2016 and the security implications identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on the same day. It was made public on 22 November 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11
Important: Information DisclosureCVE-2016-6816
The code that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack and/or obtain sensitive information from requests other then their own.
This was fixed in revision 1767641.
This issue was reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 11 October 2016 and made public on 22 November 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11
5 September 2016 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M10
Low: Unrestricted Access to Global ResourcesCVE-2016-6797
The ResourceLinkFactory did not limit web application access to global JNDI resources to those resources explicitly linked to the web application. Therefore, it was possible for a web application to access any global JNDI resource whether an explicit ResourceLink had been configured or not.
This was fixed in revision 1757271.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 18 January 2016 and made public on 27 October 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9
Low: Security Manager BypassCVE-2016-6796
A malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet.
This was fixed in revisions 1758487 and 1763232.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 27 December 2015 and made public on 27 October 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9
Low: System Property DisclosureCVE-2016-6794
When a SecurityManager is configured, a web application's ability to read system properties should be controlled by the SecurityManager. Tomcat's system property replacement feature for configuration files could be used by a malicious web application to bypass the SecurityManager and read system properties that should not be visible.
This was fixed in revision 1754445.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 27 December 2015 and made public on 27 October 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9
Low: Security Manager BypassCVE-2016-5018
A malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications.
This was fixed in revisions 1754714 and 1760300.
This issue was discovered by Alvaro Munoz and Alexander Mirosh of the HP Enterprise Security Team and reported to the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 5 July 2016. It was made public on 27 October 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9
Low: Timing AttackCVE-2016-0762
The Realm implementations did not process the supplied password if the supplied user name did not exist. This made a timing attack possible to determine valid user names. Note that the default configuration includes the LockOutRealm which makes exploitation of this vulnerability harder.
This was fixed in revision 1758499.
This issue was identified by the Apache Tomcat Security Team on 1 January 2016 and made public on 27 October 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9
13 June 2016 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M8
Hobo 1 5 3 x 5. Note: The issue below was fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M7 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M7 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M8 to obtain a version that includes fixes for these issues, version 9.0.0.M7 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Moderate: Denial of ServiceCVE-2016-3092
Apache Tomcat uses a package renamed copy of Apache Commons FileUpload to implement the file upload requirements of the Servlet specification. A denial of service vulnerability was identified in Commons FileUpload that occurred when the length of the multipart boundary was just below the size of the buffer (4096 bytes) used to read the uploaded file. This caused the file upload process to take several orders of magnitude longer than if the boundary was the typical tens of bytes long.
This was fixed in revision 1743700.
This issue was identified by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team and reported to the Apache Commons team via JPCERT on 9 May 2016. It was made public on 21 June 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M6
Typora 0 9 9 31 39 =
5 January 2016 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M3
Moderate: Security Manager bypassCVE-2016-0763
This issue only affects users running untrusted web applications under a security manager.
ResourceLinkFactory.setGlobalContext()
is a public method and was accessible to web applications even when running under a security manager. This allowed a malicious web application to inject a malicious global context that could in turn be used to disrupt other web applications and/or read and write data owned by other web applications.This was fixed in revision 1725926.
This issue was identified by the Tomcat security team on 18 January 2016 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M2
Note: The issues below were fixed in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M2 but the release vote for the 9.0.0.M2 release candidate did not pass. Therefore, although users must download 9.0.0.M3 to obtain a version that includes fixes for these issues, version 9.0.0.M2 is not included in the list of affected versions.
Low: Directory disclosureCVE-2015-5345
When accessing a directory protected by a security constraint with a URL that did not end in a slash, Tomcat would redirect to the URL with the trailing slash thereby confirming the presence of the directory before processing the security constraint. It was therefore possible for a user to determine if a directory existed or not, even if the user was not permitted to view the directory. The issue also occurred at the root of a web application in which case the presence of the web application was confirmed, even if a user did not have access.
The solution was to implement the redirect in the DefaultServlet so that any security constraints and/or security enforcing Filters were processed before the redirect. The Tomcat team recognised that moving the redirect could cause regressions so two new Context configuration options (
mapperContextRootRedirectEnabled
and mapperDirectoryRedirectEnabled
) were introduced. The initial default was false
for both since this was more secure. However, due to regressions such as Bug 58765 the default for mapperContextRootRedirectEnabled
was later changed to true since it was viewed that the regression was more serious than the security risk of associated with being able to determine if a web application was deployed at a given path.This was fixed in revisions 1715206, 1716882 and 1716894.
This issue was identified by Mark Koek of QCSec on 12 October 2015 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1
Low: Session FixationCVE-2015-5346
When recycling the
Request
object to use for a new request, the requestedSessionSSL
field was not recycled. This meant that a session ID provided in the next request to be processed using the recycled Request
object could be used when it should not have been. This gave the client the ability to control the session ID. In theory, this could have been used as part of a session fixation attack but it would have been hard to achieve as the attacker would not have been able to force the victim to use the 'correct' Request
object. It was also necessary for at least one web application to be configured to use the SSL session ID as the HTTP session ID. This is not a common configuration.This was fixed in revisions 1713184 and 1723414.
This issue was identified by the Tomcat security team on 22 June 2014 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1
Moderate: CSRF token leakCVE-2015-5351
The index page of the Manager and Host Manager applications included a valid CSRF token when issuing a redirect as a result of an unauthenticated request to the root of the web application. If an attacker had access to the Manager or Host Manager applications (typically these applications are only accessible to internal users, not exposed to the Internet), this token could then be used by the attacker to construct a CSRF attack.
This was fixed in revisions 1720652 and 1720655.
This issue was identified by the Tomcat security team on 8 December 2015 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1
Low: Security Manager bypassCVE-2016-0706
This issue only affects users running untrusted web applications under a security manager.
The internal StatusManagerServlet could be loaded by a malicious web application when a security manager was configured. This servlet could then provide the malicious web application with a list of all deployed applications and a list of the HTTP request lines for all requests currently being processed. This could have exposed sensitive information from other web applications, such as session IDs, to the web application.
This was fixed in revision 1722799.
This issue was identified by the Tomcat security team on 27 December 2015 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1
Moderate: Security Manager bypassCVE-2016-0714
This issue only affects users running untrusted web applications under a security manager.
Tomcat provides several session persistence mechanisms. The
StandardManager
persists session over a restart. The PersistentManager
is able to persist sessions to files, a database or a custom Store
. The cluster implementation persists sessions to one or more additional nodes in the cluster. All of these mechanisms could be exploited to bypass a security manager. Session persistence is performed by Tomcat code with the permissions assigned to Tomcat internal code. By placing a carefully crafted object into a session, a malicious web application could trigger the execution of arbitrary code.This was fixed in revisions 1725263 and 1725914.
This issue was identified by the Tomcat security team on 12 November 2015 and made public on 22 February 2016.
Affects: 9.0.0.M1